Jay (brian1789) wrote,

  • Mood:

Stirring things up, a bit...

On Sunday I went back to Washington, DC because last Thursday Jim Green, the head of the Planetary Science Division, had put us on the agenda for the Science Subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Council. This is essentially the watchdog external committee that watches what NASA is doing, reports back to OMB and Congress, and sometimes makes recommendations to the agency. We were talking to the piece of the NAC concerned with space science. This was a good opportunity for more visibility and feedback, so we scrambled to get a presentation together on our "Red Dragon" Mars-drilling mission concept, with SpaceX.

NAC minutes and presentations are public-record, Federal Register-announced kinds of meetings, so SpaceX had to scrub our talk with regard to anything proprietary that was not ready to go public. But that was easy. The presentation itself elicited more nods than frowns, and those were mostly from folks with some specific stake in the current Mars architecture (aimed at sample return beginning in 2018). It threatened to turn into a design review, at times, which was a good thing. And it made an impact... one guy afterward came up and complained that we were making his life harder (by proposing to land a ton on Mars for Discovery-level budgets) and that he'd regretfully have to call our Center Director. Attempts to quash our work are actually good news, in the sense that we're on-target and taken seriously.

Afterwards, we spent the afternoon meeting at SpaceX's DC offices and then giving another briefing over with the new-business folks at APL. Things are beginning to stir up... I'm fond of challenging established orthodoxies and powers-that-be. (This gets me in trouble at times socially, of course ;-).
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment